The Government has urged landlords to consider whether they’re treating student tenants fairly by continuing to charge them for empty accommodation.
It’s a change to the previous stance adopted back in April, when Housing Minister Chris Pincher reassured landlords it wouldn’t take sides or force them to waive rents for students, despite a vociferous campaign by the National Union of Students (NUS).
In a written question, Fabian Hamilton, Foreign and Commonwealth Shadow Minister asked the Secretary of State for Education what guidance the Government is giving student landlords about collecting rent on unoccupied accommodation.
Education Minister Michelle Donelan said:
“While it is for universities and private accommodation providers to make their own decisions about charging rents to absent students, we encourage them to consider the fairness of doing so and to clearly communicate their policies to students.
“We are aware that a number of universities and large companies have waived rents for the summer term or released students early from their contracts.”
She added that tenants with individual private landlords could discuss the possibility of an early release from their lease and encouraged them to seek support firstly from the landlord.
Donelan reiterated that they should work together to put a rent payment scheme in place.
Students have lobbied both university and private landlords to release them from their tenancies and waive rents for the summer term.
The NUS has previously demanded that every landlord should offer students a no-penalty early release from tenancy contracts for the current and next academic year. Around the country, hundreds of university students have signed up to a rent strike.
One can't help but ask the question, "Have Universities refunded students for their tuition fees?" I guess the answer is "No" as they are arguing that they are still providing tuition - albeit remotely.
So in the same vein, could landlords then not argue - They are still providing student accommodation - albeit in some cases, remotely? If our student landlords go out of business, surely this cannot be a good thing for our future students nor for our economy as a whole?
The NUS says that while it’s good to see landlords being encouraged to consider fairness, there are still many thousands of students tied into contracts with unreasonable cancellation clauses struggling to pay rents for homes they can’t live in.
Eva Crossan Jory, NUS vice president, tells LandlordZONE: “We’re calling for firmer restrictions on landlords regarding current rental contracts as well as rental contracts for September onwards. We fully support the emergency Covid legislation passed by the Scottish Parliament allowing students to cancel halls of residence contracts with seven days’ notice and a 28 day notice period for other types of accommodation contracts – this should be extended across all UK nations.”
Whilst, in theory, this seems like the most sensible option, in practice surely it would be more responsible to look at each tenancy on a case by case basis? If students have received their student loans for accommodation, and not returned those loans - would it not be more economically viable for the loans to be used for the purpose intended? The landlord would then potentially remain viable and student accommodation would be available in the future?
If each tenancy was assessed on a real not assumed level of need and a decision taken at that point, those in genuine financial difficulty could be supported. This would negate the need for a blanket approach, at the huge risk of losing good student accommodation for future academic years.
This really is a difficult discussion point, as most of us can see both sides of the argument - and can see how both make a very good point.
In light of that, is a carte blanche approach to this dilemma really the best option?